Prostate cancer screening after 70: Experts question guidance after Biden's diagnosis

Former President Joe Biden s aggressive prostate cancer assessment has raised questions about prevention and detection The U S Preventive Services Task Force USPSTF recommends that men aged to discuss the foreseen benefits and risks of PSA prostate-specific antigen screening with their healthcare provider and make an individual decision about screening They recommend that men over the age of skip screenings altogether DR MARC SIEGEL BIDEN'S PROSTATE CANCER FINDING REVEALS DANGEROUS FLAW IN SCREENING GUIDELINESThe USPSTF is a commonly used fund although other agencies and associations offer varying guidelines according to Dr Shawn Dason a urologic oncologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Dason stressed that it's central for men in their s and s to confer with their healthcare providers to make shared decisions on screening They should engage in a discussion about the topic of prostate cancer and the role of PSA in screening and the likely benefits and harms he mentioned There s a little bit of variability in whether men under age and over should be screened due to prospective risks which can include over-treatment or unnecessary healing Dason noted In past decades we didn't really have an understanding of the nuances about when prostate cancer should be treated and when it should just be observed in a protocol called proceeding surveillance he explained GLEASON TALLY FOR PROSTATE CANCER WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT BIDEN'S DIAGNOSISIt is manageable for specific men to be over-treated after a assessment he also explained In certain cases the cancer may not have led to death or other clinical problems but the medicine could cause bothersome urinary sexual or bowel-related side effects Dason declared You might be diagnosed with a prostate cancer that is not likely to really cause your death or create any other trouble for you he commented You might then receive rehabilitation for that prostate cancer and the therapy might be worse than the actual impact of the cancer itself JOE BIDEN DIAGNOSED WITH AGGRESSIVE FORM OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH METASTASIS TO THE BONEThere is much more limited material to sponsorship that screening over the age of could save a man's life from prostate cancer Dason noted while it's pretty clear that the harms of prostate cancer remedy increase with age Screening could reduce the chance of death in particular cases however which is why it's crucial to have a discussion with a medical practitioner according to Dason Men who don't have clues but are considered of average population exposure should be screened he advised Having indicators is a totally different conversation he reported CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR VITALITY NEWSLETTER Generally when we use the term screening we're talking about somebody who is not having any markers They're having an annual vitality checkup Fox News' senior clinical analyst Dr Marc Siegel revealed that he s been bothered by the guidelines not recommending routine prostate cancer screening particularly for those over age Studies have shown that use of the PSA has fallen off in men over the age of as a effect of the USPSTF recommendation he wrote in a contemporary op-ed for Fox News Digital For more Healthcare articles visit www foxnews com soundness This is particularly disturbing considering that there are over new cases of prostate cancer in the U S diagnosed every year with over deaths various of which may be preventable with earlier identification Siegel noted that recovery options have advanced over the years and are now better tolerated with fewer side effects for patients at various stages and ages Plenty of critics are saying that a president of the United States should have the majority aggressive prostate cancer screening regardless only because he is president he announced But I am saying that all men over the age of should have this screening Period Regardless of age Dason agreed that various men aged and older are appropriate candidates for screening If you're in good medical and you're going to have a reasonable life expectancy the identification of a serious prostate cancer could have a big impact on extending that life or improving your quality of life By contrast men who are not great candidates due to wellbeing issues and limited life expectancy face greater harm from a screening than benefit he clarified I would encourage men to think about their situation and have a conversation with their biological provider